<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 1056 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470327</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, interest income does not accrue merely because it is contractually due if the facts establish that no real income has arisen. Borrowers&#039; correspondence expressing inability to pay interest may demonstrate the absence of actual accrual. Accordingly, notional interest should not be computed where recoverability is unsupported and the income is unreal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:19:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 1056 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470327</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, interest income does not accrue merely because it is contractually due if the facts establish that no real income has arisen. Borrowers&#039; correspondence expressing inability to pay interest may demonstrate the absence of actual accrual. Accordingly, notional interest should not be computed where recoverability is unsupported and the income is unreal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>