<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1258 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470323</link>
    <description>Deletion of an estimated gross-profit addition after rejection of books did not raise a substantial question of law where the enhanced rate lacked supporting search material, comparable cases, or a justified basis to reject the assessee&#039;s comparables. The declared gross-profit rate was consistent with other years and exceeded rates reported by comparable carpet-manufacturing concerns, while the revenue identified no special circumstance supporting the higher estimate. The analysis states that deletion of the addition stands in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1258 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470323</link>
      <description>Deletion of an estimated gross-profit addition after rejection of books did not raise a substantial question of law where the enhanced rate lacked supporting search material, comparable cases, or a justified basis to reject the assessee&#039;s comparables. The declared gross-profit rate was consistent with other years and exceeded rates reported by comparable carpet-manufacturing concerns, while the revenue identified no special circumstance supporting the higher estimate. The analysis states that deletion of the addition stands in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>