https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470321 Judicial review of tender evaluation remains confined to the legality of the decision-making process and cannot replace the tender authority's assessment of bid responsiveness absent established mala fides, favouritism, arbitrariness, or perversity. This restriction applies with particular force where procurement arrangements are linked to foreign funding and agreed bidding conditions. Clarifications may be limited to substantially responsive bidders who clear the initial evaluation stage; refusing an opportunity to cure material deviations does not by itself constitute unequal treatment under Article 14. Confidentiality during evaluation and post-award debriefing provisions may preserve the procurement framework without removing access to legal remedies after award. en-us Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:33:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470321 Judicial review of tender evaluation remains confined to the legality of the decision-making process and cannot replace the tender authority's assessment of bid responsiveness absent established mala fides, favouritism, arbitrariness, or perversity. This restriction applies with particular force where procurement arrangements are linked to foreign funding and agreed bidding conditions. Clarifications may be limited to substantially responsive bidders who clear the initial evaluation stage; refusing an opportunity to cure material deviations does not by itself constitute unequal treatment under Article 14. Confidentiality during evaluation and post-award debriefing provisions may preserve the procurement framework without removing access to legal remedies after award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470321