<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1346 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795460</link>
    <description>Steel wire ropes drawn from iron wire rods that had already borne sales tax are not a distinct taxable commodity for a further levy. The applicable single-point taxation regime for declared goods, together with the established treatment of iron wires and ropes, precludes taxing the ropes again at 12%. The article states that the assessment and appellate orders did not apply this governing legal position, making the additional levy unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:42:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1346 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795460</link>
      <description>Steel wire ropes drawn from iron wire rods that had already borne sales tax are not a distinct taxable commodity for a further levy. The applicable single-point taxation regime for declared goods, together with the established treatment of iron wires and ropes, precludes taxing the ropes again at 12%. The article states that the assessment and appellate orders did not apply this governing legal position, making the additional levy unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>