<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1354 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795468</link>
    <description>Service-tax exemption covered installation and commissioning of public street lighting and LT lines for Panchayats, as Panchayats are local authorities and the works were predominantly for non-commercial public use. The appeal was treated as timely because delayed dispatch to an earlier address, subsequent supply of a true copy, and the assessee&#039;s prompt response supported the asserted communication date. Extended limitation could not be invoked solely on Form 26AS or income-tax data without cogent evidence of deliberate suppression or intent to evade tax. The public-utility nature of the works, bona fide belief in exemption, and absence of tax collection meant the service-tax demand was time-barred, with consequential relief available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1354 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795468</link>
      <description>Service-tax exemption covered installation and commissioning of public street lighting and LT lines for Panchayats, as Panchayats are local authorities and the works were predominantly for non-commercial public use. The appeal was treated as timely because delayed dispatch to an earlier address, subsequent supply of a true copy, and the assessee&#039;s prompt response supported the asserted communication date. Extended limitation could not be invoked solely on Form 26AS or income-tax data without cogent evidence of deliberate suppression or intent to evade tax. The public-utility nature of the works, bona fide belief in exemption, and absence of tax collection meant the service-tax demand was time-barred, with consequential relief available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>