<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1354 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795468</link>
    <description>Service-tax exemption for installation and commissioning of public street lighting and LT lines undertaken for Panchayats is examined as applying to original works predominantly intended for non-commercial public use, because Panchayats qualify as local authorities and the exemption is not confined to construction. The note also addresses limitation: delayed or defective communication of an order may support the asserted date of service for filing an appeal. Extended limitation for service-tax recovery requires cogent evidence of deliberate suppression or intent to evade tax; Form 26AS or income-tax data alone is insufficient, particularly where the works were reasonably treated as exempt public-utility services and tax was not collected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1354 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795468</link>
      <description>Service-tax exemption for installation and commissioning of public street lighting and LT lines undertaken for Panchayats is examined as applying to original works predominantly intended for non-commercial public use, because Panchayats qualify as local authorities and the exemption is not confined to construction. The note also addresses limitation: delayed or defective communication of an order may support the asserted date of service for filing an appeal. Extended limitation for service-tax recovery requires cogent evidence of deliberate suppression or intent to evade tax; Form 26AS or income-tax data alone is insufficient, particularly where the works were reasonably treated as exempt public-utility services and tax was not collected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>