<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1365 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795479</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment of property was examined where funds received through banking channels originated from an entity implicated in wrongful gains under a supply contract. The explanations that the receipt represented salary or a loan lacked supporting appointment, loan, repayment, or other transaction documents. On the available material, the funds were treated as proceeds of crime, supporting attachment of the identified property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1365 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795479</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment of property was examined where funds received through banking channels originated from an entity implicated in wrongful gains under a supply contract. The explanations that the receipt represented salary or a loan lacked supporting appointment, loan, repayment, or other transaction documents. On the available material, the funds were treated as proceeds of crime, supporting attachment of the identified property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>