<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2057 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470303</link>
    <description>Disallowance relating to exempt income is limited to the exempt income earned and cannot exceed that amount. The notes state that this conclusion favoured the assessee. For travelling and conveyance expenses, a 5% estimated disallowance was considered justified because supporting records were furnished, no specific defect in those records was identified, and the expenditure reflected a possible mix of business and personal use. The relief restricting both disallowances was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2057 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470303</link>
      <description>Disallowance relating to exempt income is limited to the exempt income earned and cannot exceed that amount. The notes state that this conclusion favoured the assessee. For travelling and conveyance expenses, a 5% estimated disallowance was considered justified because supporting records were furnished, no specific defect in those records was identified, and the expenditure reflected a possible mix of business and personal use. The relief restricting both disallowances was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>