<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470305</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year required the Commissioner&#039;s approval under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act. The approval record lacked the Commissioner&#039;s signature and date, so it did not establish that statutory sanction had been granted. Consequently, the reassessment for the relevant assessment year was invalid for want of mandatory sanction, and the reassessment order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470305</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year required the Commissioner&#039;s approval under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act. The approval record lacked the Commissioner&#039;s signature and date, so it did not establish that statutory sanction had been granted. Consequently, the reassessment for the relevant assessment year was invalid for want of mandatory sanction, and the reassessment order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>