<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470316</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 requires independent satisfaction that the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Where the original assessment order contains no error and the revisional order does not independently establish Revenue prejudice, revision is invalid. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470316</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 requires independent satisfaction that the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Where the original assessment order contains no error and the revisional order does not independently establish Revenue prejudice, revision is invalid. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>