<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1278 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795392</link>
    <description>Exemption for Aluminium Baxter Flyers intended for jute mills remains available where a job worker clears them to the principal manufacturer for heat treatment before supply to jute mills, provided intended use is established to the jurisdictional officer&#039;s satisfaction. Condition 2 does not require direct supply by the job worker to a jute mill or prohibit intermediate processing. As the goods were exclusively usable in jute spinning frames and invoices showed their subsequent supply to jute mills, the intended-use condition was met. In the absence of any prescribed prior or post-clearance intimation requirement, non-intimation is only procedural and does not defeat substantive exemption entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1278 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795392</link>
      <description>Exemption for Aluminium Baxter Flyers intended for jute mills remains available where a job worker clears them to the principal manufacturer for heat treatment before supply to jute mills, provided intended use is established to the jurisdictional officer&#039;s satisfaction. Condition 2 does not require direct supply by the job worker to a jute mill or prohibit intermediate processing. As the goods were exclusively usable in jute spinning frames and invoices showed their subsequent supply to jute mills, the intended-use condition was met. In the absence of any prescribed prior or post-clearance intimation requirement, non-intimation is only procedural and does not defeat substantive exemption entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>