<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1283 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795397</link>
    <description>An operational creditor&#039;s Section 9 insolvency application may proceed where the corporate debtor admits a running account and liability above the statutory threshold, while alleged disputes are unsupported or inconsistent with continued transactions. Unspecified payments may be appropriated in the running account on a first-in-first-out basis; financier records alone do not establish invoice-specific payment instructions. Short-supply debit notes unrelated to the claimed goods and a belated Section 10A defence do not establish a bona fide pre-existing dispute. Additional documents may be accepted before final order where filed to clarify payment-related material and already known to the opposing party. The rejection of the insolvency application was legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1283 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795397</link>
      <description>An operational creditor&#039;s Section 9 insolvency application may proceed where the corporate debtor admits a running account and liability above the statutory threshold, while alleged disputes are unsupported or inconsistent with continued transactions. Unspecified payments may be appropriated in the running account on a first-in-first-out basis; financier records alone do not establish invoice-specific payment instructions. Short-supply debit notes unrelated to the claimed goods and a belated Section 10A defence do not establish a bona fide pre-existing dispute. Additional documents may be accepted before final order where filed to clarify payment-related material and already known to the opposing party. The rejection of the insolvency application was legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>