https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795398 Master-data and director-related grievances were treated as satisfied after removal of the disputed names and updating of the company's CIRP status. Writ intervention to direct a fraud investigation was declined because restitution and investigative proceedings were underway, effective remedies existed under insolvency, anti-money-laundering and company-law regimes, and the NCLT was seized of the dispute. The asset-protection order in favour of the IRP was vacated because affected third parties had not been heard and, once merits adjudication was declined for availability of alternative remedies, interim relief could not survive as the sole final relief. Remaining disputes were left to competent fora. en-us Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795398 Master-data and director-related grievances were treated as satisfied after removal of the disputed names and updating of the company's CIRP status. Writ intervention to direct a fraud investigation was declined because restitution and investigative proceedings were underway, effective remedies existed under insolvency, anti-money-laundering and company-law regimes, and the NCLT was seized of the dispute. The asset-protection order in favour of the IRP was vacated because affected third parties had not been heard and, once merits adjudication was declined for availability of alternative remedies, interim relief could not survive as the sole final relief. Remaining disputes were left to competent fora. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795398