<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1284 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795398</link>
    <description>Efficacious statutory remedies under insolvency, anti-money-laundering and company law may displace writ jurisdiction where competent fora are already seized of the dispute. The notes state that, after correction of company master data and removal of the purported directors, those prayers stood satisfied; the investigation request was not pursued through writ relief because restitution and investigative proceedings were pending. They further state that asset-protection directions affecting third parties who were not heard could not continue once the writ petition was not entertained on merits. The remaining issues concerning investigation, assets and restitution are to be determined by the competent statutory and judicial fora.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1284 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795398</link>
      <description>Efficacious statutory remedies under insolvency, anti-money-laundering and company law may displace writ jurisdiction where competent fora are already seized of the dispute. The notes state that, after correction of company master data and removal of the purported directors, those prayers stood satisfied; the investigation request was not pursued through writ relief because restitution and investigative proceedings were pending. They further state that asset-protection directions affecting third parties who were not heard could not continue once the writ petition was not entertained on merits. The remaining issues concerning investigation, assets and restitution are to be determined by the competent statutory and judicial fora.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>