<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1288 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795402</link>
    <description>Redemption fine for confiscated old and used multifunctional devices was assessed under the Tribunal&#039;s settled approach for comparable imports, which ordinarily calibrates redemption fine at 10% and penalty at 5% of the relevant value. Applying that approach, the redemption fine was restricted to 10% of the goods&#039; value. As the penalties already remained below the applicable benchmark, they were retained. The issue was decided partly in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1288 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795402</link>
      <description>Redemption fine for confiscated old and used multifunctional devices was assessed under the Tribunal&#039;s settled approach for comparable imports, which ordinarily calibrates redemption fine at 10% and penalty at 5% of the relevant value. Applying that approach, the redemption fine was restricted to 10% of the goods&#039; value. As the penalties already remained below the applicable benchmark, they were retained. The issue was decided partly in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>