<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 179 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52817</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) order, which reversed duty demand and penalty based on a shortage of raw material and finished goods, was overturned. The original order confirming duty and penalty was reinstated as the Manager attested to the shortage without objection during the panchnama signing, and subsequent denial lacked legal value. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was accepted, and the penalty imposed was deemed reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 179 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52817</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) order, which reversed duty demand and penalty based on a shortage of raw material and finished goods, was overturned. The original order confirming duty and penalty was reinstated as the Manager attested to the shortage without objection during the panchnama signing, and subsequent denial lacked legal value. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was accepted, and the penalty imposed was deemed reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>