<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1293 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795407</link>
    <description>Undeclared gold ornaments are described as remaining liable to confiscation where no licit import documents are produced, but redemption discretion should consider the goods&#039; nature, quantity, carriage, passenger conduct and surrounding circumstances. The text distinguishes personal finished ornaments from primary gold or bullion and notes the absence of organised smuggling, sophisticated concealment or prior similar involvement. It states that a bona fide misunderstanding of baggage rules may justify permitting redemption on payment of fine rather than absolute confiscation. It further presents penalty reduction as appropriate where the ornaments are personal in nature and the penalty is disproportionate to the established conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1293 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795407</link>
      <description>Undeclared gold ornaments are described as remaining liable to confiscation where no licit import documents are produced, but redemption discretion should consider the goods&#039; nature, quantity, carriage, passenger conduct and surrounding circumstances. The text distinguishes personal finished ornaments from primary gold or bullion and notes the absence of organised smuggling, sophisticated concealment or prior similar involvement. It states that a bona fide misunderstanding of baggage rules may justify permitting redemption on payment of fine rather than absolute confiscation. It further presents penalty reduction as appropriate where the ornaments are personal in nature and the penalty is disproportionate to the established conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>