<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795409</link>
    <description>Black Money Act proceedings cannot be initiated where the assessee was not ordinarily resident in the relevant previous year and the statutory definition does not confer jurisdiction; the notice and assessment were therefore invalid. Offshore shares acquired from funds arising outside India during non-resident years were not undisclosed foreign assets where they were not acquired from income chargeable to tax in India and no applicable disclosure obligation arose. Unquoted shares also cannot be valued using the rule for bank accounts and must be valued under the separate prescribed methodology. As the assessment lacked jurisdictional and substantive basis, the related penalty could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795409</link>
      <description>Black Money Act proceedings cannot be initiated where the assessee was not ordinarily resident in the relevant previous year and the statutory definition does not confer jurisdiction; the notice and assessment were therefore invalid. Offshore shares acquired from funds arising outside India during non-resident years were not undisclosed foreign assets where they were not acquired from income chargeable to tax in India and no applicable disclosure obligation arose. Unquoted shares also cannot be valued using the rule for bank accounts and must be valued under the separate prescribed methodology. As the assessment lacked jurisdictional and substantive basis, the related penalty could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>