<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1299 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795413</link>
    <description>Rule 11UA(2) permits an assessee to choose between prescribed valuation methods for determining the fair market value of shares. Where the Net Asset Value method is chosen and its computation from audited financial statements contains no irregularity, tax authorities may scrutinise or revalue only within that method; they cannot reject it as unrealistic or substitute another basis. Alleged circumvention of foreign-exchange requirements falls outside the Income-tax Act and Rules where the overseas investment was authorised and no competent authority alleged a breach. In the absence of established tax benefit or unaccounted-money introduction, taxing excess premium on right shares under Section 56(2)(viib) was considered unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1299 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795413</link>
      <description>Rule 11UA(2) permits an assessee to choose between prescribed valuation methods for determining the fair market value of shares. Where the Net Asset Value method is chosen and its computation from audited financial statements contains no irregularity, tax authorities may scrutinise or revalue only within that method; they cannot reject it as unrealistic or substitute another basis. Alleged circumvention of foreign-exchange requirements falls outside the Income-tax Act and Rules where the overseas investment was authorised and no competent authority alleged a breach. In the absence of established tax benefit or unaccounted-money introduction, taxing excess premium on right shares under Section 56(2)(viib) was considered unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>