<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1323 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795437</link>
    <description>Penalty for belated furnishing of a tax audit report was unsustainable where the report was filed during reassessment, considered by the Assessing Officer before completion, and resulted in no reassessment addition. The delayed filing was treated as a technical or venial breach that caused no prejudice to the Revenue. Applying coordinate-bench decisions on materially identical facts, the penalty for failure to timely furnish the report was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1323 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795437</link>
      <description>Penalty for belated furnishing of a tax audit report was unsustainable where the report was filed during reassessment, considered by the Assessing Officer before completion, and resulted in no reassessment addition. The delayed filing was treated as a technical or venial breach that caused no prejudice to the Revenue. Applying coordinate-bench decisions on materially identical facts, the penalty for failure to timely furnish the report was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>