<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1336 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795450</link>
    <description>Retrospective cancellation of GST registration cannot be sustained where the show cause notice does not disclose or propose cancellation from an earlier date. The notes state that the registration was cancelled retrospectively despite the absence of prior notice on that proposed effect. Applying the relevant Division Bench ruling, and with the Revenue not disputing the facts or governing legal position, the cancellation order was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1336 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795450</link>
      <description>Retrospective cancellation of GST registration cannot be sustained where the show cause notice does not disclose or propose cancellation from an earlier date. The notes state that the registration was cancelled retrospectively despite the absence of prior notice on that proposed effect. Applying the relevant Division Bench ruling, and with the Revenue not disputing the facts or governing legal position, the cancellation order was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>