<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 175 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of coating pipes post-manufacture should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The duty demand and penalty imposed by Central Excise authorities were deemed legally unsustainable as they conflicted with established legal positions and relevant Circulars, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 175 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of coating pipes post-manufacture should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The duty demand and penalty imposed by Central Excise authorities were deemed legally unsustainable as they conflicted with established legal positions and relevant Circulars, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>