<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Joint development agreement taxability requires factual scrutiny of revenue accrual, possession, refundable deposits, and stock-in-trade character.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101939</link>
    <description>Taxability under a Joint Development Agreement is examined where land is held as stock-in-trade, with focus on whether revenue accrues, whether an interest-free refundable security deposit constitutes consideration, and whether possession was transferred. The notes state that the capital-gains provision for specified development agreements involving capital assets does not apply to stock-in-trade. They also identify material factual questions requiring examination, including the termination notice and its effect, project status, the deposit&#039;s character and use, and the agreement&#039;s revenue-recognition terms. The matter described was remitted for fresh consideration after a remand report, objections, and reasonable opportunity, without a merits determination of taxability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Joint development agreement taxability requires factual scrutiny of revenue accrual, possession, refundable deposits, and stock-in-trade character.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101939</link>
      <description>Taxability under a Joint Development Agreement is examined where land is held as stock-in-trade, with focus on whether revenue accrues, whether an interest-free refundable security deposit constitutes consideration, and whether possession was transferred. The notes state that the capital-gains provision for specified development agreements involving capital assets does not apply to stock-in-trade. They also identify material factual questions requiring examination, including the termination notice and its effect, project status, the deposit&#039;s character and use, and the agreement&#039;s revenue-recognition terms. The matter described was remitted for fresh consideration after a remand report, objections, and reasonable opportunity, without a merits determination of taxability.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:48:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>