<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1835 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470282</link>
    <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and execution of non-bailable warrants require compliance with statutory safeguards, including officer authorisation, recorded written reasons to believe, communication of arrest grounds, and forwarding of relevant material to the Special Judge. The notes state that judicial review is limited to assessing whether the reasons rest on material capable of establishing guilt, rather than reassessing evidentiary adequacy or subjective satisfaction. Displaying a soft copy of warrants may notify their substance where no hard copy is sought. Prior participation in investigation does not necessarily bar arrest where warrants remain unexecuted, cooperation is lacking, and tracing alleged proceeds of crime is required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:33:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1835 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470282</link>
      <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and execution of non-bailable warrants require compliance with statutory safeguards, including officer authorisation, recorded written reasons to believe, communication of arrest grounds, and forwarding of relevant material to the Special Judge. The notes state that judicial review is limited to assessing whether the reasons rest on material capable of establishing guilt, rather than reassessing evidentiary adequacy or subjective satisfaction. Displaying a soft copy of warrants may notify their substance where no hard copy is sought. Prior participation in investigation does not necessarily bar arrest where warrants remain unexecuted, cooperation is lacking, and tracing alleged proceeds of crime is required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>