https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470282 Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was treated as compliant with statutory safeguards where the authorised officer recorded written reasons to believe, supplied grounds of arrest, and forwarded the required arrest material to the Special Judge. Judicial review is limited to assessing whether the reasons rest on material capable of establishing guilt, without reassessing the adequacy of evidence or subjective satisfaction. Execution of non-bailable warrants was considered sufficient where their soft copy was shown and no hard copy was sought. Prior participation in investigation did not bar arrest amid unexecuted warrants, alleged non-cooperation and the need to trace suspected proceeds of crime. en-us Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:33:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470282 Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was treated as compliant with statutory safeguards where the authorised officer recorded written reasons to believe, supplied grounds of arrest, and forwarded the required arrest material to the Special Judge. Judicial review is limited to assessing whether the reasons rest on material capable of establishing guilt, without reassessing the adequacy of evidence or subjective satisfaction. Execution of non-bailable warrants was considered sufficient where their soft copy was shown and no hard copy was sought. Prior participation in investigation did not bar arrest amid unexecuted warrants, alleged non-cooperation and the need to trace suspected proceeds of crime. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470282