<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1824 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470252</link>
    <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires material and recorded reasons to believe. Subsisting non-bailable warrants, an upheld ECIR, and dismissal of anticipatory bail are treated as providing a prima facie basis for arrest; warrant or proclamation procedures do not excuse investigative inaction where the accused is openly available and no stay or quashing exists. Candidate-disclosure challenges engage voters&#039; right to material information, but Article 329 restricts writ intervention once an election process begins. After the election concludes, alleged defects in nomination affidavits must be pursued through the statutory election-petition remedy rather than writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1824 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470252</link>
      <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires material and recorded reasons to believe. Subsisting non-bailable warrants, an upheld ECIR, and dismissal of anticipatory bail are treated as providing a prima facie basis for arrest; warrant or proclamation procedures do not excuse investigative inaction where the accused is openly available and no stay or quashing exists. Candidate-disclosure challenges engage voters&#039; right to material information, but Article 329 restricts writ intervention once an election process begins. After the election concludes, alleged defects in nomination affidavits must be pursued through the statutory election-petition remedy rather than writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>