<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1750 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470255</link>
    <description>An ex parte appellate order passed without service of hearing notices and without a reasoned merits-based determination does not comply with Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The notes state that failure to afford the assessee an effective opportunity to present evidence breaches principles of natural justice and fair play. The appellate order was set aside, and the assessment was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1750 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470255</link>
      <description>An ex parte appellate order passed without service of hearing notices and without a reasoned merits-based determination does not comply with Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The notes state that failure to afford the assessee an effective opportunity to present evidence breaches principles of natural justice and fair play. The appellate order was set aside, and the assessment was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>