<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1750 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470255</link>
    <description>An ex parte appellate order passed without service of hearing notices and without a reasoned merits-based determination fails to satisfy Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the principles of natural justice. Adequate opportunity to present evidence and contest the assessment is required for fair appellate adjudication. The appellate order was set aside, and the assessment was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after granting adequate hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1750 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470255</link>
      <description>An ex parte appellate order passed without service of hearing notices and without a reasoned merits-based determination fails to satisfy Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the principles of natural justice. Adequate opportunity to present evidence and contest the assessment is required for fair appellate adjudication. The appellate order was set aside, and the assessment was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after granting adequate hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>