<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2031 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470260</link>
    <description>An appellate authority should adjudicate substantive grounds on merits rather than dismiss an appeal solely for delay where the challenge to an adjustment in an intimation remains undecided. The notes state that refusal to condone delay followed by dismissal without merits adjudication was unsustainable. The matter was restored to the first appellate authority for a decision on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2031 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470260</link>
      <description>An appellate authority should adjudicate substantive grounds on merits rather than dismiss an appeal solely for delay where the challenge to an adjustment in an intimation remains undecided. The notes state that refusal to condone delay followed by dismissal without merits adjudication was unsustainable. The matter was restored to the first appellate authority for a decision on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>