<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2033 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470281</link>
    <description>An article notes that the Delhi HC found no substantial question of law in the Revenue&#039;s appeal because the identical issue for earlier assessment years between the same parties had already been resolved against the Revenue. Applying parity of reasoning, the issue remained in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2033 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470281</link>
      <description>An article notes that the Delhi HC found no substantial question of law in the Revenue&#039;s appeal because the identical issue for earlier assessment years between the same parties had already been resolved against the Revenue. Applying parity of reasoning, the issue remained in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>