<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 166 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52798</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially successful as the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants for Reason Codes 30, 57, 81, 27, and 53, overturning the credit reversals. However, the appeal failed for Reason Codes 13, 31, and 54, upholding the credit reversals for these reasons. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and modified the orders accordingly, allowing credit for certain rejected components used in or in relation to the manufacturing process of motor vehicles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:23:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 166 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52798</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially successful as the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants for Reason Codes 30, 57, 81, 27, and 53, overturning the credit reversals. However, the appeal failed for Reason Codes 13, 31, and 54, upholding the credit reversals for these reasons. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and modified the orders accordingly, allowing credit for certain rejected components used in or in relation to the manufacturing process of motor vehicles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>