<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1196 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795310</link>
    <description>Suspension of a resolution professional&#039;s registration for alleged misconduct in one CIRP should not, pending appeal, automatically prevent work on other assignments without a hearing concerning those assignments. The statutory framework preserves the respective committees of creditors&#039; role in appointment or replacement, and Regulation 13(7) permits communication of disciplinary action to those committees. A blanket suspension was described as prima facie disproportionate because it displaced those committees&#039; statutory role and affected unrelated assignments. The suspension was stayed for assignments other than the CIRP in which the professional had been removed, while the Board may communicate its order to the relevant committees for their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:32:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1196 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795310</link>
      <description>Suspension of a resolution professional&#039;s registration for alleged misconduct in one CIRP should not, pending appeal, automatically prevent work on other assignments without a hearing concerning those assignments. The statutory framework preserves the respective committees of creditors&#039; role in appointment or replacement, and Regulation 13(7) permits communication of disciplinary action to those committees. A blanket suspension was described as prima facie disproportionate because it displaced those committees&#039; statutory role and affected unrelated assignments. The suspension was stayed for assignments other than the CIRP in which the professional had been removed, while the Board may communicate its order to the relevant committees for their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>