https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795387 Statutory appellate remedy was treated as the appropriate route for challenging the GST demand order, with no basis identified to bypass that remedy through writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was required to pursue the appeal before the Appellate Authority. To preserve access to that remedy, the period spent prosecuting the writ petition was directed to be excluded when computing the limitation period, provided the appeal is filed within the stipulated period. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:32:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795387 Statutory appellate remedy was treated as the appropriate route for challenging the GST demand order, with no basis identified to bypass that remedy through writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was required to pursue the appeal before the Appellate Authority. To preserve access to that remedy, the period spent prosecuting the writ petition was directed to be excluded when computing the limitation period, provided the appeal is filed within the stipulated period. Case-Laws GST Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795387