<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 618 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470203</link>
    <description>Oral evidence may be admitted to establish special or compelling circumstances surrounding execution of a registered sale document where it does not contradict or vary its written terms, including the recorded consideration. Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act restrict variation of documentary terms but permit evidence relevant to the circumstances of execution, subject to assessment of its probative value by the reference court. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 may be exercised not only against perverse subordinate-court orders but also to prevent manifest injustice. The evidentiary opportunity concerning valuation-related circumstances therefore remains available for the reference court&#039;s evaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:45:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 618 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470203</link>
      <description>Oral evidence may be admitted to establish special or compelling circumstances surrounding execution of a registered sale document where it does not contradict or vary its written terms, including the recorded consideration. Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act restrict variation of documentary terms but permit evidence relevant to the circumstances of execution, subject to assessment of its probative value by the reference court. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 may be exercised not only against perverse subordinate-court orders but also to prevent manifest injustice. The evidentiary opportunity concerning valuation-related circumstances therefore remains available for the reference court&#039;s evaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>