https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795234 Cheque dishonour liability arose because the evidence established the complainant's financial capacity, underlying loan transactions, execution of the cheque, and its dishonour. A return memo stating that the drawer's signature differed does not preclude liability where the account also lacked sufficient funds and statutory requirements are satisfied. The further advance to a relative despite an unpaid earlier loan, and the cheque being typewritten, did not make the transaction improbable or invalidate execution. The accused's inconsistent claim of an earlier loan and blank cheque failed to rebut the presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability; the acquittal was therefore unsustainable. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:37:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795234 Cheque dishonour liability arose because the evidence established the complainant's financial capacity, underlying loan transactions, execution of the cheque, and its dishonour. A return memo stating that the drawer's signature differed does not preclude liability where the account also lacked sufficient funds and statutory requirements are satisfied. The further advance to a relative despite an unpaid earlier loan, and the cheque being typewritten, did not make the transaction improbable or invalidate execution. The accused's inconsistent claim of an earlier loan and blank cheque failed to rebut the presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability; the acquittal was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795234