https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795255 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record or another recognised ground; it cannot be used to reopen issues already decided or to reargue merits as an appeal in disguise. The text states that the review applications sought reconsideration of previously examined and rejected questions without demonstrating any manifest error in the earlier judgment. It further records that the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions and declined to interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution. en-us Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:37:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795255 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record or another recognised ground; it cannot be used to reopen issues already decided or to reargue merits as an appeal in disguise. The text states that the review applications sought reconsideration of previously examined and rejected questions without demonstrating any manifest error in the earlier judgment. It further records that the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions and declined to interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795255