<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1143 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795257</link>
    <description>Capital-gains taxation under a joint development arrangement requires an effective, enforceable and final transfer of possession and rights under section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A. Subsequent partition litigation, property re-allocation and a later development agreement indicated that the original arrangement lacked finality, so no taxable capital gain accrued in the relevant year. Agricultural income from inherited land cannot be recharacterised as income from other sources merely because older contemporaneous records are unavailable where land use and prior agricultural income remain supported and uncontroverted. A third-party statement under section 132(4) requires corroborative material linking undisclosed income to the assessee; ad hoc apportionment without such material is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1143 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795257</link>
      <description>Capital-gains taxation under a joint development arrangement requires an effective, enforceable and final transfer of possession and rights under section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A. Subsequent partition litigation, property re-allocation and a later development agreement indicated that the original arrangement lacked finality, so no taxable capital gain accrued in the relevant year. Agricultural income from inherited land cannot be recharacterised as income from other sources merely because older contemporaneous records are unavailable where land use and prior agricultural income remain supported and uncontroverted. A third-party statement under section 132(4) requires corroborative material linking undisclosed income to the assessee; ad hoc apportionment without such material is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>