<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795292</link>
    <description>Timely filing of returns remains a statutory obligation, and non-compliance with a standard operating procedure for system-generated reminders does not relieve a registered person from late fees for delayed filing. The reminder procedure is facilitative only and cannot override the prescribed filing requirement. Where notice was served but returns were still not filed within the stipulated period, delayed filing continues to attract the applicable late fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795292</link>
      <description>Timely filing of returns remains a statutory obligation, and non-compliance with a standard operating procedure for system-generated reminders does not relieve a registered person from late fees for delayed filing. The reminder procedure is facilitative only and cannot override the prescribed filing requirement. Where notice was served but returns were still not filed within the stipulated period, delayed filing continues to attract the applicable late fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>