<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory pre-cognizance hearing under BNSS applies to SEBI complaints where the special statute provides no inconsistent procedure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101865</link>
    <description>Under the SEBI Act, the first proviso to Section 223(1) of the BNSS applies to a complaint filed by the Board because the Act restricts who may initiate prosecution but does not prescribe a different cognizance procedure. The provision creates a mandatory pre-cognizance opportunity of hearing for the proposed accused. Treating the Special Court as a Court of Session does not exclude that requirement. On this analysis, cognizance and consequential process issued without such hearing were quashed, with fresh consideration directed after hearing the accused; merits remained open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:37:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory pre-cognizance hearing under BNSS applies to SEBI complaints where the special statute provides no inconsistent procedure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101865</link>
      <description>Under the SEBI Act, the first proviso to Section 223(1) of the BNSS applies to a complaint filed by the Board because the Act restricts who may initiate prosecution but does not prescribe a different cognizance procedure. The provision creates a mandatory pre-cognizance opportunity of hearing for the proposed accused. Treating the Special Court as a Court of Session does not exclude that requirement. On this analysis, cognizance and consequential process issued without such hearing were quashed, with fresh consideration directed after hearing the accused; merits remained open.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:37:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>