<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1827 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470180</link>
    <description>Restoration applications for ex parte dismissals may be treated as rectification applications where the appellant&#039;s absence is adequately explained, an internal filing direction was not communicated, and the pending application can be entertained by the same Bench. This permits recall of the ex parte dismissal and adjudication on merits. Tribunal appellate jurisdiction over seizure or confiscation of foreign currency is not excluded by the baggage-related exception merely because currency falls within the definition of goods. That exception is confined to baggage-rule violations and related declarations; appeals concerning seized foreign currency lie before the Tribunal rather than the Government&#039;s Revisional Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 20:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1827 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470180</link>
      <description>Restoration applications for ex parte dismissals may be treated as rectification applications where the appellant&#039;s absence is adequately explained, an internal filing direction was not communicated, and the pending application can be entertained by the same Bench. This permits recall of the ex parte dismissal and adjudication on merits. Tribunal appellate jurisdiction over seizure or confiscation of foreign currency is not excluded by the baggage-related exception merely because currency falls within the definition of goods. That exception is confined to baggage-rule violations and related declarations; appeals concerning seized foreign currency lie before the Tribunal rather than the Government&#039;s Revisional Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>