<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2011 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470182</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed as infructuous on an unverified assumption of settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme requires fresh merits adjudication where the settlement concerned a separate assessment order. The notes state that the National Faceless Appeal Centre relied on incorrect portal information without direct confirmation, and that the assessee must receive an opportunity to be heard before determination. Delay in challenging the dismissal may be condoned on terms where responsibility for the confusion is shared, the assessee&#039;s understanding of the applicable transfer arrangement was not unfounded, and the COVID-19 limitation exclusion is material. The matter was restored for adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 20:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2011 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470182</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed as infructuous on an unverified assumption of settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme requires fresh merits adjudication where the settlement concerned a separate assessment order. The notes state that the National Faceless Appeal Centre relied on incorrect portal information without direct confirmation, and that the assessee must receive an opportunity to be heard before determination. Delay in challenging the dismissal may be condoned on terms where responsibility for the confusion is shared, the assessee&#039;s understanding of the applicable transfer arrangement was not unfounded, and the COVID-19 limitation exclusion is material. The matter was restored for adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>