<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2013 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470184</link>
    <description>Admission of additional evidence was considered where the documents were relevant to determining the taxpayer&#039;s claims and the explanation for their earlier non-production was accepted. As the Revenue did not seriously oppose admission or fresh examination, the evidence was admitted. The claims and remaining contentions were remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after giving the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity of being heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 20:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2013 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470184</link>
      <description>Admission of additional evidence was considered where the documents were relevant to determining the taxpayer&#039;s claims and the explanation for their earlier non-production was accepted. As the Revenue did not seriously oppose admission or fresh examination, the evidence was admitted. The claims and remaining contentions were remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after giving the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity of being heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>