<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 2017 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470188</link>
    <description>Addition for cessation of liability cannot be sustained unless the assessment record establishes that the liability had actually ceased in the relevant assessment year. The notes state that the outstanding liability, previously claimed as revenue expenditure, was written off only in a subsequent year and was then disclosed as taxable income. On that basis, deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 20:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 2017 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470188</link>
      <description>Addition for cessation of liability cannot be sustained unless the assessment record establishes that the liability had actually ceased in the relevant assessment year. The notes state that the outstanding liability, previously claimed as revenue expenditure, was written off only in a subsequent year and was then disclosed as taxable income. On that basis, deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>