<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1417 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470173</link>
    <description>Contractual profit allocation did not alter the housing-project deduction where the identical issue had already been resolved for the same assessee. The commercial-area condition under Section 80IB(10) applied only to projects approved on or after 01.04.2005, so it did not affect earlier approved projects. Separate municipal approvals for commercial and residential areas also did not defeat the deduction claim because the issue had previously been settled without distinguishing facts or law. The article notes that no substantial question of law arose and the claimed deduction remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 12:09:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1417 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470173</link>
      <description>Contractual profit allocation did not alter the housing-project deduction where the identical issue had already been resolved for the same assessee. The commercial-area condition under Section 80IB(10) applied only to projects approved on or after 01.04.2005, so it did not affect earlier approved projects. Separate municipal approvals for commercial and residential areas also did not defeat the deduction claim because the issue had previously been settled without distinguishing facts or law. The article notes that no substantial question of law arose and the claimed deduction remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>