<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 803 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470170</link>
    <description>Reopening of a completed assessment requires a reason to believe that taxable income escaped assessment based on tangible material and cannot be used to review an earlier view. The assessment record of an association of persons contained a detailed finding that the assessee&#039;s entitlement to 35% of gross sale proceeds represented revenue sharing for surrendered development rights rather than a share of profits. As that material was not considered in the assessee&#039;s original assessment and differed from the earlier year&#039;s record, the reopening was within jurisdiction and did not constitute a change of opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 803 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470170</link>
      <description>Reopening of a completed assessment requires a reason to believe that taxable income escaped assessment based on tangible material and cannot be used to review an earlier view. The assessment record of an association of persons contained a detailed finding that the assessee&#039;s entitlement to 35% of gross sale proceeds represented revenue sharing for surrendered development rights rather than a share of profits. As that material was not considered in the assessee&#039;s original assessment and differed from the earlier year&#039;s record, the reopening was within jurisdiction and did not constitute a change of opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>