<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1045 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795159</link>
    <description>Revisional proceedings under Section 64 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act must be initiated by calling for records within four years and completed by a final order within five years of the order under revision; orders beyond that outer period are barred. Security charges, qualifying transportation expenditure and fuel expenditure may be deducted in determining works-contract taxable turnover where permitted by Rule 3(2) and its Explanation II; revision cannot rest on a mere change of opinion where the original assessment was legally permissible. A taxpayer cannot use suo motu revision to introduce a fresh expenditure claim. Input tax credit issues require fresh adjudication where the taxpayer must be given an opportunity to prove genuine purchases and physical movement of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1045 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795159</link>
      <description>Revisional proceedings under Section 64 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act must be initiated by calling for records within four years and completed by a final order within five years of the order under revision; orders beyond that outer period are barred. Security charges, qualifying transportation expenditure and fuel expenditure may be deducted in determining works-contract taxable turnover where permitted by Rule 3(2) and its Explanation II; revision cannot rest on a mere change of opinion where the original assessment was legally permissible. A taxpayer cannot use suo motu revision to introduce a fresh expenditure claim. Input tax credit issues require fresh adjudication where the taxpayer must be given an opportunity to prove genuine purchases and physical movement of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>