<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1066 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795180</link>
    <description>An appeal filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) beyond the statutorily prescribed filing period and the expressly permitted further condonable period cannot be entertained. The appellate limitation scheme confines the authority&#039;s power to condone delay to that outer limit, while the general condonation power under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is excluded. As the undisputed delay fell outside the permitted condonable period, the appeal was barred by limitation, resulting in a finding against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1066 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795180</link>
      <description>An appeal filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) beyond the statutorily prescribed filing period and the expressly permitted further condonable period cannot be entertained. The appellate limitation scheme confines the authority&#039;s power to condone delay to that outer limit, while the general condonation power under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is excluded. As the undisputed delay fell outside the permitted condonable period, the appeal was barred by limitation, resulting in a finding against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>