<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 151 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52758</link>
    <description>Remission of duty was admissible on sugar bags destroyed in a fire caused by an electrical short circuit. Once the destruction of the goods was accepted and the fire&#039;s origin was found to be a short circuit, attributing the loss to the assessee&#039;s carelessness was inconsistent with the recorded facts. The Revenue did not dispute that remission was otherwise available under the applicable excise rule, so denial of remission could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 151 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52758</link>
      <description>Remission of duty was admissible on sugar bags destroyed in a fire caused by an electrical short circuit. Once the destruction of the goods was accepted and the fire&#039;s origin was found to be a short circuit, attributing the loss to the assessee&#039;s carelessness was inconsistent with the recorded facts. The Revenue did not dispute that remission was otherwise available under the applicable excise rule, so denial of remission could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>