<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1095 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795209</link>
    <description>An alleged tax adjustment remained disputed despite a revised assessment showing no balance payable. The notes identify rectification through an application as the appropriate mechanism, subject to verification of relevant records by the concerned authority. The petitioner may seek rectification, and the authority must decide the application within six weeks of receiving it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1095 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795209</link>
      <description>An alleged tax adjustment remained disputed despite a revised assessment showing no balance payable. The notes identify rectification through an application as the appropriate mechanism, subject to verification of relevant records by the concerned authority. The petitioner may seek rectification, and the authority must decide the application within six weeks of receiving it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>