<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1106 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795220</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in filing revised returns to claim exemption for ex gratia compensation requires pragmatic and liberal consideration of genuine hardship. The notes state that consistent relief, including condonation, had been granted to identically placed retirees and those decisions had attained finality, but this was not properly considered when the application was rejected. The rejection was therefore described as unsustainable and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1106 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795220</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in filing revised returns to claim exemption for ex gratia compensation requires pragmatic and liberal consideration of genuine hardship. The notes state that consistent relief, including condonation, had been granted to identically placed retirees and those decisions had attained finality, but this was not properly considered when the application was rejected. The rejection was therefore described as unsustainable and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>