<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1106 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795220</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in filing revised returns to claim exemption for ex gratia compensation required pragmatic and liberal consideration of genuine hardship. Consistent relief, including condonation, granted to identically placed retirees and having attained finality required proper consideration. Rejection of condonation without addressing that parity was unsustainable, and the rejection was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1106 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795220</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in filing revised returns to claim exemption for ex gratia compensation required pragmatic and liberal consideration of genuine hardship. Consistent relief, including condonation, granted to identically placed retirees and having attained finality required proper consideration. Rejection of condonation without addressing that parity was unsustainable, and the rejection was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>