https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795223 Challenges to suspension and cancellation of GST registration should ordinarily be pursued through the statutory appeal mechanism where an effective appellate remedy is available. Although revocation of cancellation under Section 30 contemplates a hearing before rejection of a revocation application, an unconsidered representation does not prevent the aggrieved registered person from appealing a cancellation order under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The notes state that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not warranted in these circumstances, and the challenge should be raised through the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795223 Challenges to suspension and cancellation of GST registration should ordinarily be pursued through the statutory appeal mechanism where an effective appellate remedy is available. Although revocation of cancellation under Section 30 contemplates a hearing before rejection of a revocation application, an unconsidered representation does not prevent the aggrieved registered person from appealing a cancellation order under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The notes state that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not warranted in these circumstances, and the challenge should be raised through the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws GST Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795223