<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1110 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795224</link>
    <description>A challenge to tax demand in writ jurisdiction is addressed where an appellate remedy is available. The text records that no merits determination was made on the show-cause notice, assessment order, or arrear notice because recourse to the appellate remedy was sought. Liberty was granted to file an appeal with an application for condonation of delay and the required statutory pre-deposit, while coercive action was restrained during the stipulated period for filing that appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1110 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795224</link>
      <description>A challenge to tax demand in writ jurisdiction is addressed where an appellate remedy is available. The text records that no merits determination was made on the show-cause notice, assessment order, or arrear notice because recourse to the appellate remedy was sought. Liberty was granted to file an appeal with an application for condonation of delay and the required statutory pre-deposit, while coercive action was restrained during the stipulated period for filing that appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>