<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Personal guarantor liability permits SARFAESI enforcement despite corporate debtor CIRP where no guarantor insolvency application is pending.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101826</link>
    <description>SARFAESI enforcement against personal guarantors may continue while CIRP is pending only against the corporate debtor, because the corporate-debtor moratorium does not extend to guarantors. The notes explain that an interim moratorium for a personal guarantor arises only when a creditor files an insolvency application against that guarantor; a demand notice alone is insufficient. They further state that IBC consolidation provisions do not apply where no guarantor insolvency proceeding exists, and that SARFAESI and debt-recovery proceedings are complementary remedies rather than mutually exclusive elections. On the stated facts, the possession notice, auction and sale certificate were restored by setting aside the contrary DRT directions; the Bank&#039;s writ petition was treated as maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Personal guarantor liability permits SARFAESI enforcement despite corporate debtor CIRP where no guarantor insolvency application is pending.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101826</link>
      <description>SARFAESI enforcement against personal guarantors may continue while CIRP is pending only against the corporate debtor, because the corporate-debtor moratorium does not extend to guarantors. The notes explain that an interim moratorium for a personal guarantor arises only when a creditor files an insolvency application against that guarantor; a demand notice alone is insufficient. They further state that IBC consolidation provisions do not apply where no guarantor insolvency proceeding exists, and that SARFAESI and debt-recovery proceedings are complementary remedies rather than mutually exclusive elections. On the stated facts, the possession notice, auction and sale certificate were restored by setting aside the contrary DRT directions; the Bank&#039;s writ petition was treated as maintainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>