https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470147 Statutory remedy under the SARFAESI framework was treated as the appropriate route for challenging possession and vacation notices, particularly where the borrowers had invoked the Debts Recovery Tribunal remedy under Section 17. Reconsideration of an extension to a one-time settlement did not warrant relief where the borrowers failed to provide a concrete plan for paying the outstanding settlement amount and interest for delayed payment. The writ petition was therefore not considered fit for entertainment. en-us Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:13:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470147 Statutory remedy under the SARFAESI framework was treated as the appropriate route for challenging possession and vacation notices, particularly where the borrowers had invoked the Debts Recovery Tribunal remedy under Section 17. Reconsideration of an extension to a one-time settlement did not warrant relief where the borrowers failed to provide a concrete plan for paying the outstanding settlement amount and interest for delayed payment. The writ petition was therefore not considered fit for entertainment. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470147